Some photos are very clear. Here’s a photo. You look at it, to see straight away what it’s of. And, you do see. All is clear. It may or may not be interesting, but it is at least clear.
Other photos can be almost completely baffling, like this one, which I photoed in the summer of 2014:
I say “almost” completely baffling, because you can clearly see Big Ben in there, reflected in … whatever it’s reflected in. Reflected no less than four times. But what are all those bluey-grey and shiny shapes? Is it a car? Guess: yes. But is another car reflected in an original car? Are those shiny reflective surfaces glass or metal? But which surfaces, on what sort of car? Or cars? Side window? Back window? Maybe you can tell, but I just can’t work out what the full story is there.
This is one of those times when I badly need a back-up photo to explain what’s going on, less zoomy, with context. At least we’d know which way up we are, and what the original reflecting object consists of.
What I like best are photos in between the clear ones and the baffling ones, where you can work out what you’re looking at, but only after having given it some thought. (Examples of which may, or then again my not, follow.)
This one is of interest because, simply as an abstract pattern, this does have something going for it. The colours are nice, with the yellow Big Bens brightly lit up by the sunshine of that summer day. The shapes are nice, in a Zaha Hadid sort of way. But, what is it?
4 thoughts on “Context needed”
That is baffling. Could the car have been parked in front of a glass walled building?
It looks to me like a car headlight unit with multiple chrome-plated surfaces within; the orange indicator bulb peeking out towards the top confirms this.
Bingo! That has to be it. Once you realise that this scene is a lot smaller than it at first looks, it all starts to makes sense. I do love my zoom lens camera. (My newest camera has a zoom 3 times more powerful.)
FNS’s conjecture is confirmed, for me, by the fact that about a decade and a half ago, when these elaborate headlights first arrived, I was obsessed with photoing them. (I am now obsessed with old-school cars with those plain round headlights that date them so definitely. I now photo those, whenever I see them.)
So, I was photoing this headlight for old time’s sake, so to speak. I still photo these elaborate headlights occasionally, now, especially when there are fun things being reflected in them. And that’s what I was doing there. But not so much now, because they are the norm.
So, puzzle solved. Thank you.
By the way, you also solved, for me, the question of what that orange blob is. That was baffling me also.